ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi

@pbatard, have you tested it? Any kind of solution? What system are you booting from? Users have been encountering issues with Ventoy not working or experiencing booting issues. If you look at UEFI firmware settings, you will usually see that CSM and Secure Boot cannot be enabled at the same time, for this precise reason. Hiren's Boot CD with UEFI support? - Super User Which brings us nicely to what this is all about: Mitigation. However, users have reported issues with Ventoy not working properly and encountering booting issues. ? Without complex workarounds, XP does not support being installed from USB. 1.0.80 actually prompts you every time, so that's how I found it. But it shouldn't be to the user to do that. The best workaround is to install some Linux variant (I use Fedora but Ubuntu and SUSE are supported) and install VirtualBox. The MEMZ virus nyan cat as an image file produces a very weird result, It also happens when running Ventoy in QEMU, The MEMZ virus nyan cat as an image file produces a very weird result And unfortunately, because Ventoy is derived from GRUB 2.0, the only way it could run in a Secure Boot environment (without using MokManager) is if it is loaded through a SHIM. I've made some tests this evening, it should be possible to make more-or-less proper Secure Boot support in Ventoy, but that would require modification of grub code to use shim protocol, and digital signatures for all Ventoy efi files, modules, etc. Questions about Grub, UEFI,the liveCD and the installer. The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: I believe GRUB (at least v2.04 and previous versions if patched with Fedora patches) already work exactly as you've described. We talk about secure boot, not secure system. This disk, after being installed on a USB flash drive and booted from, effectively disables Secure Boot protection features and temporary allows to perform almost all actions with the PC as if Secure Boot is disabled. Thank you! I can provide an option in ventoy.json for user who want to bypass secure boot. There are many other applications that can create bootable disks but Ventoy comes with its sets of features. So all Ventoy's behavior doesn't change the secure boot policy. 4. When install Ventoy, maybe an option for user to choose. ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi - FOTO SKOLA I rarely get any problems with other menu systems based on grub2\grub4dos\syslinux\isolinux, just Ventoy gives problems. Can it boot ok? ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefidibujo del sistema nervioso y sus partes para nios ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi. en_windows_10_business_editions_version_1909_updated_april_2020_x64_dvd_aa945e0d.iso | 5 GB, en_windows_10_business_editions_version_2004_x64_dvd_d06ef8c5.iso | 5 GB And of course, by the same logic, anything unsigned should not boot when Secure Boot is active. Do I still need to display a warning message? As I understand, you only tested via UEFI, right? Yep, the Rescuezilla v2.4 thing is not a problem with Ventoy. By default, the ISO partition can not be mounted after boot Linux (will show device busy when you mount). Finally, click on "64-bit Download" and it will start downloading Windows 11 from Microsoft's server. Expect working results in 3 months maximum. If the ISO file name is too long to displayed completely. Shims and other Secure Boot signed chain loaders do not remove the feature of warning about boot loaders that have not been signed (by either MS or the Shim holders). It says that no bootfile found for uefi. No bootfile found for UEFI image does not support x64 UEFI Sorry, I meant to upgrade from the older version of Windows 11 to 22H2. When enrolling Ventoy, they do not. The user could choose to run a Microsoft Windows Install ISO downloaded from the MS servers and Ventoy could inject a malicious file into it as it boots. Yes, anybody can make a UEFI bootloader that chain loads unsigned bootloaders with the express purpose of defeating Secure Boot. You answer my questions and then I will answer yours MEMZ.img was listed with no changes for me. Well, that's pretty much exactly what I suggested in points 1-4 from the original post, with point 4 altered from "an error should be returned to the user and bootx64.efi should not be launched" to "an error should be returned to the user who can then decide if they still want to launch bootx64.efi". i was test in VMWare 16 for rufus, winsetupusb, yumiits okay, https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_mYChRFanLEdyttDvT-cn6zH0o6KX7Th/view?usp=sharing. Linux distributives use Shim loader, each distro with it's own embedded certificate unique for each distro. So even when someone physically unplugs my SSD and installs a malicious bootloader/OS to it, it won't be able to decrypt the main OS partition. This software will repair common computer errors, protect you from file loss, malware, hardware failure and optimize your PC for maximum performance. The file formats that Ventoy supports include ISO, WIM, IMG, VHD(x), EFI files. I'll see if I can find some time in the next two weeks to play with your solution, but don't hold your breath. It . The worst part is, at the NSA level, this is peanuts to implement, and it certainly doesn't require teams of coders or mathematicians trying to figure out a flaw or vulnerability. Will polish and publish the code later. *far hugh* -> Covid-19 *bg*. Thus, on a system where Secure Boot is enabled, users should rightfully expect to be alerted if the EFI bootloader of an ISO booted through Ventoy is not Secure Boot signed or if its signature doesn't validate. Did you test using real system and UEFI64 boot? I'll test it on a real hardware a bit later. Ventoy loads Linux kernels directly, which are also signed with embedded Shim certificate (not with the certificate trusted by EFI DB). Would be nice if this could be supported in the future as well. it doesn't support Bluetooth and doesn't have nvidia's proprietary drivers but it's very easy to install. Oooh, ok, I read up a bit on how PCR registers work during boot, and now it makes much more sense. Sign in (Haswell Processor) Tested in Memdisk and normal mode with 1.0.08b2. In the install program Ventoy2Disk.exe. In Windows, Ventoy2Disk.exe will only list the device removable and in USB interface type by default. So I apologise for that. Error : @FadeMind Many thanks! Ventoy does not always work under VBox with some payloads. Can't try again since I upgraded it using another method. For example, Ventoy can be modified to somehow chainload full chain of distros shim grub kernel, or custom validation functions could be made, which would, for example, validate and accept files signed with certificates in DB + a set of custom certificates (like ones embedded in distros' Shims), or even validate and automatically extract Shims embedded certificates and override EFI validation functions (as it's done currently to completely disable validation), but is this kind of complexity worth it for a USB boot utility which is implemented to be simple and convenient? Fix PC issues and remove viruses now in 3 easy steps: download and install Ventoy on Windows 10/11, Brother Printer Paper Jam: How to Easily Clear It, Fix Missing Dll Files in Windows 10 & Learn what Causes that. Have you tried grub mode before loading the ISO? Delete the Ventoy secure boot key to fix this issue. They can't eliminate them totally, but they can provide an additional level of protection. The Flex image does not support BIOS\Legacy boot - only UEFI64. Maybe the image does not support x64 uefi . Test these ISO files with Vmware firstly. That's not at all how I see it (and from what I read above also not @ventoy sees it). Win10UEFI Another issue about Porteus and Aporteus : if we copy ISO via dd or other tools or copy ISO contents to EFI partition of USB work perfectly in UEFI. Currently there is only a Secure boot support option for check. Adding an efi boot file to the directory does not make an iso uefi-bootable. 1. to your account, MB: GA-P110-D3, CPU: Intel Core i5 6400, RAM: 8GB DDR4, GPU: IGFX + NVIDIA GT730, MB: GA-H81M-S2PV, CPU : Intel Core i3 4650, RAM 8GB DDR3 GPU: IGFX, slitaz-rolling-core-5in1.iso This option is enabled by default since 1.0.76. The point is that if a user whitelists Ventoy using MokManager, they are responsible for anything that they then subsequently run using Ventoy. @ventoy I have tested on laptop Lenovo Ideapad Z570 and Memtest86-4.3.7.iso and ipxe.iso gived same error but with additional information: netboot.xyz-efi.iso (v2.0.17), manjaro-gnome-20.0.3-200606-linux56.iso, Windows10_PLx64_2004.iso worked fine. Go ahead and download Rufus from here. Getting the same error as @rderooy. 1.0.84 UEFI www.ventoy.net ===> 8 Mb. It supports x86 Legacy BIOSx86 Legacy BIOS,x86_64 UEFIx86_64 UEFI, ARM64 UEFI, IA32 UEFI and MIPS64EL UEFI. Yes. Still having issues? Nevertheless, thanks for the explanation, it cleared up some things for me around the threat model of Secure Boot. This iso seems to have some problem with UEFI. Secure Boot is tricky to deal with and can (rightfully) be seen as a major inconvenience instead of yet another usually desireable line of defence against malware (but by all means not a panacea). fdisk: Create a primary partition with partition type EFI (FAT-12/16/32). You can reformat it with FAT32/NTFS/UDF/XFS/Ext2/Ext3/Ext4 filesystem, the only request is that Cluster Size must greater than or equal to 2048. I would also like to point out that I reported the issue as a general remark to help with Ventoy development, after looking at the manner in which Ventoy was addressing the Secure Boot problem (and finding an issue there), rather than as an actual Ventoy user. @adrian15, could you tell us your progress on this? In a fit of desperation, I tried another USB drive - this one 64GB instead of 8GB. Just some of my thoughts: Can't install Windows 7 ISO, no install media found ? Mybe the image does not support X64 UEFI! Paragon ExtFS for Windows [issue]: ventoy can't boot any iso on Dell Inspiron 3558, but can boot No bootfile found for UEFI! Issue #313 ventoy/Ventoy GitHub It's the job of Ventoy's custom GRUB to ensure that what is being chainloaded is Secure Boot compliant because that's what users will expect from a trustworthy boot application in a Secure Boot environment. Must hardreset the System. About Fuzzy Screen When Booting Window/WinPE, Ventoy2Disk.exe can't enumerate my USB device. (This post was last modified: 08-06-2022, 10:49 PM by, (This post was last modified: 08-08-2022, 01:23 PM by, (This post was last modified: 08-08-2022, 05:52 PM by, https://forums.ventoy.net/showthread.phpt=minitool, https://rmprepusb.blogspot.com/2018/11/art-to.html. Do NOT put the file to the 32MB VTOYEFI partition. and windows password recovery BootCD Background Some of us have bad habits when using USB flash drive and often pull it out directly. Ventoy No Boot File Found For Uefi - My Blog 2. . fails to find system in /slax, 'Hello System' os can boot successfully with bootx64.efi's machine and show desktop. Latest Laptop UEFI 64+SECURE BOOT ON Blocked message. pentoo-full-amd64-hardened-2020.0_p20200527.iso - 4 GB, avg_arl_cdi_all_120_160420a12074.iso - 178 MB, Fedora-Security-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20200419.n.0.iso - 1.80 GB Try updating it and see if that fixes the issue. I've been trying to do something I've done a milliion times before: This has always worked for me. However, after adding firmware packages Ventoy complains Bootfile not found. same here on ThinkPad x13 as for @rderooy An encoding issue, perhaps (for the text)? So use ctrl+w before selecting the ISO. Remove the Windows 7 installation CD/DVD from the disc tray, type exit in Command Prompt and press Enter. You signed in with another tab or window. A Multiboot Linux USB for PC Repair | Page 135 - GBAtemp.net Both are good. I'm aware that Super GRUB2 Disk's author tried to handle that, I'll ask him for comments. MD5: f424a52153e6e5ed4c0d44235cf545d5 Yeah to clarify, my problem is a little different and i should've made that more clear. After boot into the Ventoy main menu, pay attention to the lower left corner of the screen: 3. If you allow someone physical access to your Secure Boot-enabled system, and you have not disabled USB booting in the BIOS (or booting from CD\DVD), then there is no point in implementing a USB-based Secure Boot loader. Asks for full pathname of shell. I didn't try install using it though. So, yeah, if you have access to to the hardware, then Secure Boot, TPM or whatever security measure you currently have on consumer-grade products, is pretty much useless because, as long as you can swap hardware components around, or even touch the hardware (to glitch the RAM for instance), then unless the TPM comes with an X-Ray machine that can scan and compare hardware components, you're going to have a very hard time plugging all the many holes through which a dedicated attacker can gain access to your data. However, because no additional validation is performed after that, this leaves system wild open to malicious ISOs. If you get some error screen instead of the above blue screen (for example, Linpus lite xxxx). for grub modules, maybe I can pack all the modules into one grub.efi and for other efi files(e.g. If someone uses Ventoy with Secure Boot, then Ventoy should not green light UEFI bootloaders that don't comply with Secure Boot. I tested it but trying to boot it will fail with an I/O error. In this situation, with current Ventoy architecture, nothing will boot (even Fedora ISO), because the validation (and loading) files signed with Shim certificate requires support from the bootloader and every chainloaded .efi file (it uses custom protocol, regular EFI functions can't be used. Acronis True Image 2020 24.6.1 Build 25700 in Legacy is working in Memdisk mode on 1.0.08 beta 2 but on another older Version of Acronis 2020 sometimes is boot's up but the most of the time he's crashing after loading acronis loader text. I still don't know why it shouldn't work even if it's complex. And we've already been over whether USB should be treated differently than internal SATA or NVMe (which, in your opinion it should, and which in mine, and I will assert the majority of people who enable Secure Boot, it shouldn't). Agreed. check manjaro-gnome, not working. Although a .efi file with valid signature is not equivalent to a trusted system. But even the user answer "YES, I don't care, just boot it." How to Fix No bootfile found for UEFI on a Laptop or Desktop PC - YouTube After the reboot, select Delete MOK and click Continue. Maybe I can provide 2 options for the user in the install program or by plugin. las particiones seran gpt, modo bios TinyCorePure64-13.1.iso does UEFI64 boot OK /s. I can 3 options and option 3 is the default. see http://tinycorelinux.net/13.x/x86_64/release/ @ValdikSS Thanks, I will test it as soon as possible. MediCAT It's a pain in the ass to do yes, but I wouldn't qualify it as very hard. 2There are two methods: Enroll Key and Enroll Hash, use whichever one. I don't remember exactly but it said something like it requires to install from an Installation media after the iso booted. There are many kinds of WinPE. a media that was created without using Ventoy) running in a Secure Boot environment, so if your point is that because Ventoy uses a means to inject content that Microsoft has chosen not to secure, it makes the whole point of checking Secure Boot useless, then that reasoning logically also applies to official unmodified retail Windows ISOs, because you might as well tell everyone who created a Windows installation media (using the MCT for instance): "There's really no point in having Secure Boot enabled on your system, since someone can just create a Windows media with a malicious Windows\System32\winpeshl.exe payload to compromise your system at early boottime anyway" Again, if someone has Secure Boot enabled, and did not whitelist a third party UEFI bootloader themselves, then they will expect the system to warn them in that third party bootloader fails Secure Boot validation, regardless of whether they did enrol a bootloader that chain loaded that third party bootloader. To add Ventoy to Easy2Boot v2, download the latest version of Ventoy Windows .ZIP file and drag-and-drop the Ventoy zip file onto the \e2b\Update agFM\Add_Ventoy.cmd file on the 2nd agFM partition. The main point of Secure Boot is to prevent (or at least warn about) the execution of bootloaders that have not been vetted by Microsoft or one of the third parties that Microsoft signed a shim for (such as Red Hat). They all work if I put them onto flash drives directly with Rufus. Well occasionally send you account related emails. unsigned kernel still can not be booted. Ventoy also supports BIOS Legacy. () no boot file found for uefi. I will not release 1.1.0 until a relatively perfect secure boot solution. Ventoy should only allow the execution of Secure Boot signed Some questions about using KLV-Airedale - Page 4 - Puppy Linux size 5580453888 bytes (5,58 GB) When it asks Delete the key (s), select Yes. Copy the efisys.bin from C: > Windows > Boot > DVD > EFI > en-US to your desktop 3. I've hacked-up PreLoader once again and managed to cleanly chainload Ubuntu ISO with Secure Boot enabled. and leave it up to the user. 6. Again, the major problem I see with this fine discussion is that everybody appears to be tiptoeing around the fact that some users have no clue what Secure Boot is intended for (only that, because it says "Secure" they don't want to turn it off), and, rather than trying to educate them about that, we're trying to find ways to keep them "feeling safe" when the choices they might make would leave their system anything but. New version of Rescuezilla (2.4) not working properly. And that is the right thing to do. I'm afraid I'm very busy with other projects, so I haven't had a chance. In Windows, Ventoy2Disk.exe will only list the device removable and in USB interface type by default. ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi Boots, but unable to find its own files; specifically, does not find boot device and waits user input to find its root device. The main annoyance in my view is that it requires 2 points of contact for security updates (per https://github.com/rhboot/shim-review) and that I have some doubts that Microsoft will allow anything but a formal organization with more than a couple of people to become a SHIM provider. Ubuntu.iso). Thank you for your suggestions! 2. That error i have also with WinPE 10 Sergei is booting with that error ( on Skylake Processor). Ventoy loads Linux kernels directly, which are also signed with embedded Shim certificate. The live folder is similar to Debian live. And they can boot well when secure boot is enabled, because they use bootmgr.efi directly from Windows iso. @ventoy When user check the Secure boot support option then only run .efi file with valid signature is select. @MFlisar Hiren's Boot CD was down with UEFI (legacy still has some problem), manjaro-kde-20.0-rc3-200422-linux56.iso BOOT Extracting the very same efi file and running that in Ventoy did work! Turned out archlinux-2021.06.01-x86_64 is not compatible. mishab_mizzunet 1 yr. ago ventoy_x64.efi/ventoy_util_x64.efi ) , they do need digital signatures. If the ISO is on the tested list, then clearly it is a problem with your particular equipment, so you need to give the details. ia32 . Ventoy @ValdikSS, I'm not seeing much being debated, when the link you point to appears to indicate that pretty much everybody is in agreement that loading unsigned kernels from GRUB, in a Secure Boot environment, is a bug (hence why it was reported as such). @steve6375 I've mounted that partition and deleted EFI folder but it's still recognized as EFI, both in Windows Disk Management and the BIOS, just doesn't boot anymore. JonnyTech's response seems the likely circumstance - however: I've The BIOS decides to boot Ventoy in Legacy BIOS mode or in UEFI mode. Ventoy - Open source USB boot utility for both BIOS and UEFI Hi, Hiren's Boot CD can be booted by Ventoy in Memdisk mode, you try Ventoy 1.0.08 beta2. Ventoy is an open source tool that lets you create a bootable USB drive for ISO files. Guid For Ventoy With Secure Boot in UEFI 1All the steps bellow only need to be done once for each computer when booting Ventoy at the first time. So, I'm trying to install Arch, but after selecting Arch from Ventoy I keep getting told that "No Bootfile found for UEFI! Option1: Use current solution(Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk), then user will be clearly told that, in this case, the secure boot will be by passed. By clicking Sign up for GitHub, you agree to our terms of service and With ventoy, you don't need to format the disk over and over, you just need to copy the ISO/WIM/IMG/VHD (x)/EFI. accomodate this. access with key cards) making sure that your safe does get installed there, so that it should give you an extra chance to detect ill intentioned people trying to access its content. In a real use case, when you have several Linux distros (not all of which have Secure Boot support), several unsigned UEFI utilities, it's just easier to temporary disable Secure Boot with SUISBD method. DSAService.exe (Intel Driver & Support Assistant). Some Legacy BIOS has an access limitation and wont read a disk that exceeds the limitation. GRUB mode fixed it! screenshots if possible Keeping Ventoy and ISO files updated can help avoid any future booting issues with Ventoy. Code that is subject to such a license that has already been signed might have that signature revoked. https://osdn.net/projects/manjaro/storage/kde/, https://abf.openmandriva.org/platforms/cooker/products/4/product_build_lists/3250, https://abf.openmandriva.org/product_build_lists, chromeos_14816.99.0_reven_recovery_stable-channel_mp-v2.bin, https://github.com/rescuezilla/rescuezilla/releases/download/2.4/rescuezilla-2.4-64bit.jammy.iso, https://nyancat.fandom.com/wiki/MEMZ_Nyan_Cat, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mv6Cbew_y8&t=1m13s, https://mega.nz/folder/TI8ECBKY#i89YUsA0rCJp9kTClz3VlA. Well occasionally send you account related emails. slax 15.0 boots I adsime that file-roller is not preserving boot parameters, use another iso creation tool. It was actually quite the struggle to get to that stage (expensive too!) You can have BIOS with TPM and disk encryption and, provided your hardware manufacturer implements anti tampering protection to ensure that the TPM is not sharing data it shouldn't share with parts of the system that should not be trusted, it should be no less secure than TPM-based encryption on a Secure Boot enabled system. Therefore, Ventoy/Grub should be altered as follows: Hopefully this shouldn't be too complex to add, though it may require some research, and modifying GRUB to do just that might require a lot of work. error was now displayed in 1080p. This ISO file doesn't change the secure boot policy. You signed in with another tab or window. Perform a scan to check if there are any existing errors on the USB. Even debian is problematic with this laptop. Hi, HDClone 9.0.11 ISO is stating on UEFI succesfully but on Legacy after choose "s" or "x64" to start hdclone it open's a black windows in front of the Ventoy Menu and noting happens more. Then congratulations: You have completely removed any benefits of using Secure Boot for any person who enrolled Ventoy on their Secure Boot computer. 1.- comprobar que la imagen que tienes sea de 64 bits md5sum 6b6daf649ca44fadbd7081fa0f2f9177 Do I still need to display a warning message? https://nyancat.fandom.com/wiki/MEMZ_Nyan_Cat Inspection of the filesystem within the iso image shows the boot file(s) - including the UEFI bootfile - in the respective directory. Yes, I finally managed to get UEFI:NTFS Secure Boot signed 2 days ago, and that's part of why there's a new release of Rufus today, that includes the signed version of UEFI:NTFS. I hope there will be no issues in this adoption. # Archlinux minimal Install with btrfs ## Introduction If you don't know about Arch Linux, and willing to learn, then check this post, - [Arch Linux](https://wiki . I'd be interested in a shim for Rufus as well, since I have the same issue with wanting UEFI:NTFS signed for Secure Boot, but using GRUB 2 code for the driver, that makes Secure Boot signing it impossible. The current release of Slax (slax-64bit-11.2.1.iso) fails to boot using UEFI64 using ventoy with the error message: I can provide an option in ventoy.json for user who want to bypass secure boot.

What Is Tension Of Globalization And Destruction Brainly, Articles V